Search for: "Goldstein v. California" Results 21 - 40 of 560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2021, 2:20 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
Tran 20-1541 [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, is counsel to the respondents in this case. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Joel Goldstein previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am by Dan Stein
Briefly: At this blog, Tom Goldstein provides a “plain English” summary of this past Term’s rulings on same-sex marriage, affirmative action (in Fisher v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Prosecutors say $32 million staged slip-fall ring drew on services of litigation finance firm [Matthew Goldstein and Jessica Silver-Greenberg, New York Times] Federalist Society podcast previews Frank v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:19 pm by JB
Regents of the University of California, decided in 1978, at which point Earl Warren has been off the Court for nine years and dead for four years. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:29 am by Amanda Frost
Brown, the Court is revisiting that question in DaimlerChrysler AG v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 8:42 am by Ronald Mann
The California courts rejected Viking’s argument, relying on well settled California law (from a case named Iskanian v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:53 am by Amy Howe
[Disclosure:  Tom Goldstein of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., the publisher of this blog, argued Walden on behalf of the respondents; the firm's Kevin Russell was among the counsel to the petitioner in Fernandez.] [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:06 am by Ronald Mann
  Three years ago, after California courts refused to enforce provisions in arbitration agreements that barred class arbitration (on the ground that the provisions were unconscionable), a closely divided court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:17 am by Amy Howe
California, in which the Court will consider whether the police can search a dwelling over an absent defendant’s objection when the defendant’s co-tenant has consented, and Northwest v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
[Disclosure:  The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the petitioner in Riley v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 2:56 pm
California (No. 06-8120); David G. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry and United States v. [read post]