Search for: "Goldstein v. California" Results 21 - 40 of 481
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2014, 5:53 am by Amy Howe
[Disclosure:  Tom Goldstein of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., the publisher of this blog, argued Walden on behalf of the respondents; the firm's Kevin Russell was among the counsel to the petitioner in Fernandez.] [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:06 am by Ronald Mann
  Three years ago, after California courts refused to enforce provisions in arbitration agreements that barred class arbitration (on the ground that the provisions were unconscionable), a closely divided court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:17 am by Amy Howe
California, in which the Court will consider whether the police can search a dwelling over an absent defendant’s objection when the defendant’s co-tenant has consented, and Northwest v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
[Disclosure:  The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the petitioner in Riley v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 2:56 pm
California (No. 06-8120); David G. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry and United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 6:48 am by Marissa Miller
This weekend’s coverage of the Court concentrated on developments in the constitutional challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage, Fisher v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 3:06 am by Walter Olson
’s Initiative 77] “How Regulation Eliminated Your Waiter” [Ira Stoll on California labor laws] 1915 study on Oregon: “The belief was very prevalent among store women that the minimum wage had wrought only harm to them as a whole. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:38 am by Dan Stein
Perry (holding that the proponents of California’s ban on same-sex marriage lacked standing to defend it on appeal). [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 7:37 am by Kali Borkoski
Kevin Russell, also of Goldstein & Russell, filed an amicus brief on behalf of former senators in support of the respondents in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:06 pm by Ronald Mann
Perhaps the vigor of the Court’s resolution of DIRECTV, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 8:57 am
Pounds (1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 6 and Goldstein v. [read post]