Search for: "Goldstein v. California"
Results 41 - 60
of 493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2010, 8:14 am
(See Swain v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 8:57 am
Pounds (1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 6 and Goldstein v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 10:31 am
Superior Court of California (about personal jurisdiction). [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
Perry; Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C. was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am
At its Conference on February 27, 2015, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as Article III standing in class actions, exemption from California’s campaign finance disclosure requirements, and the retroactive application of Miller v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 8:00 pm
CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 4:22 pm
In Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:30 am
Utah v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 1:54 pm
California, 134 S.Ct. 2473 (2014). [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 4:39 pm
McIntyre Machinery v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:38 am
California and United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2012, 6:03 am
Perry, in which the Court will consider the constitutionality of California’s Proposition 8, continue to receive the majority of media attention. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 4:26 am
At NPR, Nina Totenberg reports on Wednesday’s oral argument in Lee v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 3:14 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., a wage-and-hour case she argued before the California Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:03 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 7:27 pm
Handel’s Enters. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:31 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represents the petitioners in Freeman.] [read post]
15 May 2013, 7:48 am
Goldstein, P.C., was among the counsel to the respondents in Bush v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 3:56 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
