Search for: "Goldstein v. California" Results 41 - 60 of 560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2020, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:47 am by Maxwell Kennerly
” The District Court ruled that Garrigan should have used lawyers in rural Texas, and so Goldstein Demchak had to bill rural Texas, not urban California, rates. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 3:06 am by Walter Olson
’s Initiative 77] “How Regulation Eliminated Your Waiter” [Ira Stoll on California labor laws] 1915 study on Oregon: “The belief was very prevalent among store women that the minimum wage had wrought only harm to them as a whole. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:38 am by Dan Stein
Perry (holding that the proponents of California’s ban on same-sex marriage lacked standing to defend it on appeal). [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 7:37 am by Kali Borkoski
Kevin Russell, also of Goldstein & Russell, filed an amicus brief on behalf of former senators in support of the respondents in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:06 pm by Ronald Mann
Perhaps the vigor of the Court’s resolution of DIRECTV, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:28 am
For some analysis for the decision, go the California Punitive Damages blog.) [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 10:31 am by Mark Walsh
Superior Court of California (about personal jurisdiction). [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:27 am by Sam Barr
Perry; Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C. was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am by Maureen Johnston
At its Conference on February 27, 2015, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as Article III standing in class actions, exemption from California’s campaign finance disclosure requirements, and the retroactive application of Miller v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC v. [read post]