Search for: "Goldstein v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 1,086
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2013, 4:44 am by Amy Howe
At the Ogletree Deakins blog, Hera Arsen reports on today’s dismissal of Unite Here Local 355 v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
Hungar, Deputy Solicitor General, argued next on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of petitioner. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving restitution for victims of child pornography; and White v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:03 pm by Jeffrey M. Goldstein
In so concluding, the Court ruled that Blanton, the plaintiff employee of a Domino’s franchisee, had adequately pled that Domino’s used the franchise agreements to orchestrate a conspiracy among their franchisees to not compete for labor; Blanton says that the no-hire provision is evidence of that conspiracy and violates the Sherman Antitrust Act because it unreasonably restrains competition for Domino’s franchise employees and depresses employee wages, lessens employee benefits,… [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 7:34 pm by Jeffrey M. Goldstein
Liberty Tax Loses Preliminary Injunction to Former Liberty Franchisee Regarding Enforcement of Post-Term Restriction Liberty Tax Franchisee Represented by GLF Wins in Post-Term Covenant Case in Federal Court ——————————————————— UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA JTH TAX LLP, doing business as Liberty Tax Service , Plaintiff,… [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, one of the cases that they considered at their private conference last week. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:31 am by Maureen Johnston
Kerry 13-628Issue: Whether a federal statute that directs the Secretary of State, on request, to record the birthplace of an American citizen born in Jerusalem as born in "Israel" on a Consular Report of Birth Abroad and on a United States passport is unconstitutional on the ground that the statute "impermissibly infringes on the President's exercise of the recognition power reposing exclusively in him." [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:17 am by Miriam Seifter
  (Arlington says this is the same question the Court always asks at “Step Zero” of its Chevron inquiry, pursuant to the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:21 pm
(Of note, in that Term, the Court impressively managed to decide United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
United States Postal Service, the court held 6-3 that the government is not a “person” who can challenge the validity of a patent under the America Invents Act. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 4:41 am by Amy Howe
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse looks at the Connecticut Supreme Court’s recent ruling abolishing the death penalty in that state; she argues that the court “not only produced an important ruling for its own jurisdiction” but also “addressed the United States Supreme Court frankly and directly,” “at a crucial moment of mounting unease. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
At Vox (via How Appealing), Ian Millhiser argues that United States v. [read post]