Search for: "Goldstein v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 974
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2008, 9:43 pm
United States, 444 U.S. 164 (1979)), we're going to do whatever we can to avoid filing it so it gets considered on June 23. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:05 am by Nabiha Syed
United States; JURIST has coverage of both cases, while the Conglomerate offers a round-table on questions raised by Erica P. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:32 am by Ronald Mann
When the Court heard argument Monday morning in No. 10-290, Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, it had as distinguished a group of advocates as it is likely to have this Term:  former Solicitor General Seth Waxman (for i4i), former Deputy Solicitor General Tom Hungar (for Microsoft) and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart (for the United States, arguing in support of i4i).  [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 7:12 pm by Jeffrey M. Goldstein
Goldstein Although “force majeure” or “act of god” cases do not arise frequently in the franchise litigation world, a relatively recent case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York turned in part on this doctrine. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:23 am by Nabiha Syed
With the Court’s winter recess underway, commentators continue their discussion of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At this blog, Marty Lederman discusses the impact of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 6:54 am by Cormac Early
United States, in which it considered whether appellate courts reviewing for plain error in criminal cases should consider the state of the law at the time of appeal or at the time of trial.   [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry and United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
But a question for those who do: Is the long-term upshot of Herring v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:19 pm by JB
Wade is a bipartisan decision that actually unites the left and the right wings of the Court. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:38 am by Dan Stein
Coverage of the Court continues to focus on the fallout from its recent decisions in United States v. [read post]