Search for: "Goldstein v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 977
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
  In two of the new cases, United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:30 pm
United StatesIssue: Whether criminal defendants must object at the time a sentence is imposed in order to challenge the sentence as either procedurally or substantively unreasonable under United States v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 8:22 am
Note: This is the second in a series of posts written by Tom Goldstein, with research by Jason Harrow, regarding the state of the Court at "Mid-Term. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:07 am by Kali Borkoski
The first opinion of the day came in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 5:23 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Writing for the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in Luis v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses last week’s grant in the two cell phone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:20 am by Joshua Matz
Tom Goldstein discussed the argument in Williams v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 7:37 pm by Jeffrey M. Goldstein
June 17, 2019 Name of Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Short Case Name: Tim Hortons v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 8:46 pm by Jeffrey M. Goldstein
(which, for convenience, we refer to collectively and in the singular as “Walgreen”) operate retail pharmacies throughout the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:40 am by Amy Howe
  The Court also invited the Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in six cases: Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:27 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Perry, while the firm’s Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by Allison Trzop
United States, in which the Court made it harder for the federal government to use the fact of a prior criminal conviction to increase a criminal sentence; American Express Co. v. [read post]