Search for: "Gomez v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 38
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 10:38 am
Burbank Police Department et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case BC414602, Filed May 28, 2009. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:26 pm
Gomez v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:03 am
Gomez-Jimenez v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:21 am
Superior Court (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1125, 1136 (Gomez), emphasis added.) [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am
These cases are filed with the court and are all public record. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:43 pm
Seymore v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:02 pm
(See Gomez, supra, 173 Cal.App.4th 508 [30-minute telephone response time]; Dinges v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am
The superior court dismissed the motion, and the Supreme Court affirmed, noting that Mr. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 11:47 am
The plethora of paperwork has a disproportionate impact on trial courts in counties where state prisons are located--many of which are small county courts. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 8:41 am
No.34-2008-00015011-CU-OR-GDS)APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, Loren E. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
Gomez (2003) and Carl v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(IP finance) Global - Patents Study published in Science magazine ‘Promoting Intellectual Discovery: Patents Versus Markets’ concludes free markets superior to patent monopolies (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) Economic woes impact valuations, but not all sectors are suffering (Technology Transfer Tactics) Cancer Institute study show impact of patent age on deal probability (Technology Transfer Tactics) Should management be involved in patenting decisions? [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Superior Court, 270 Cal. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
o SCOTUS docket hereFederal Appellate Court DecisionsØ Paul Mollica's Daily Developments in EEO Law here6th CircuitMadden v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Gomez-Gomez, No. 05-41461 Sentence for illegally reentering the United States is affirmed by the court sitting en banc, where a prior sex offense committed using constructive, i.e. nonphysical, force qualified as a "forcible sex offense" for sentence-enhancement purposes. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 6:19 pm
In State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]