Search for: "Gomez v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 360
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As a result, on April 24, 2023, in a telephone call between Sebco and United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the latter indicted that [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 6:15 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
Co. v Campbell (538 US 408 [2003]), and Gomez v Cabatic (159 AD3d 62 [2d Dept 2018]). [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 10:05 am by Guest Author
There Chief Justice John Roberts cited then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s dissent from denial of rehearing en banc in United States Telecom Assn. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:30 am by Sheila Vélez Martinez
Sheila Vélez Martinez Despite our long historical presence, there is a general sociolegal invisibility of Latina/os in the United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 2:04 pm by Neal Davis
Given that the United States houses over 20% of the world’s prisoners despite being 5% of the global population (ACLU, 2017), it may be time to reexamine how the Supreme Court’s Gideon v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
The [Colorado anti-SLAPP] statute allows a person (usually a defendant) to file a special motion to dismiss "[a] cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the person's right of petition or free speech under the United States constitution or the state constitution in connection with a public issue. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm by Taylor Ross
New York City was not only the COVID-19 epicenter in the United States; it has also been a hub for several budding lawsuits challenging the inadequacy of remote special education provisions, Natalie Gomez-Velez of CUNY School of Law argues. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am by Matthew Ackerman
Qualified Immunity:  Federal law provides a cause of action for individuals who have been “depriv[ed] of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws” of the United States by a person acting under the color of law. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 10:44 pm by Josh Blackman
First, Roberts wrote a solo dissent in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:54 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
” Those with Expired Visas: Individuals whose DV-2020 visas have expired may not be issued replacement visas; however, individuals who received diversity visas in 2020 as a result of orders in the court case Gomez v. [read post]