Search for: "Gomez v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 361
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
Medtronic, Inc., 451 F.3d 104 (2d Cir. 2006); Gomez v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 5:11 am
See United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 3:56 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 3:04 pm
United States, 866 A.2d 67, 74 (D.C. 2005). [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:23 am
State, 610 So.2d 1288 (Fla.1992); Segal v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 9:29 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 12:39 pm
But I couldn't help noticing how Narvaez-Gomez initially gets detained -- which eventually leads to his being sentenced to eight years in prison for being a deported alien found in the United States.The police initially detain Narvaez-Gomez because he's smoking in a public park (in San Diego, again) that apparently doesn't allow smoking. [read post]
20 May 2007, 9:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 6:14 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 12:22 pm
United States, 802 A.2d 367, 369 (D.C. 2002); Gomez v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 5:36 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 2:12 am
Per United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 1:15 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeDetective's Notes During Interview of Deceased Deposition Witness Not Jencks Act Statements United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 5:34 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:06 pm
Because the decision was made by a French court and did not apply United States laws, little consideration, if any, was given to free speech concerns. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 4:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 12:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeCompleteness Doctrine Referenced in Holding Agent's Notes Admitted to Avoid Misleading Jury; New Trial Denied United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 5:25 am
McCooe, expressed his disagreement with his colleagues in a pithy memorandum decision which reads, in substantial part, as follows:A rent-stabilized tenant who moves to another apartment in the same building to become the superintendent reverts to rent-stabilized status when his employment is terminated for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Mohr v Gomez (173 Misc 2d 553 [App Term, 1st Dept 1997, McCooe, J., dissenting]). [read post]
