Search for: "Gonzales v. Oregon" Results 21 - 40 of 63
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2014, 6:45 am
An interesting wrinkle in the preemption argument, as put forward by the complaining states, is that it expressly relies upon the rationale of Gonzales v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:00 am by Ronald Collins
From my teaching post at the University of Oregon, I had written a book, To An Unknown God: Religious Freedom on Trial (2001), that was a history of one case. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 3:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
There aren’t many lower court decisions applying the federal and state RFRAs, and there is only one Supreme Court decision applying the federal RFRA, Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:30 pm by Lauren Bateman
” These include the dismantling of terror cells in Portland, Oregon, and Lackawanna, New York, as well as the conviction of several Al Qaeda and Lashkar-e-Taiba affiliates operating in the United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
In Descamps, Justice Kagan wrote for the Supreme Court on an issue that permeates our work as federal defenders: what impact do prior convictions have on our clients’ freedom? [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:42 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The Second Circuit found the Labor Department’s interpretation “controlling,” while the Ninth Circuit concluded that (under Gonzales v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Salazar Docket: 10-1551 Issue: Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that, under this Court’s decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:39 pm by FDABlog HPM
Supreme Court has thwarted a prior Government attempt to define the practice of medicine in Gonzales v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am by Christa Culver
AbramsonAmicus brief for Oregon Criminal-Law and Criminal-Procedure ProfessorsAmicus brief for the Federal Public Defender of the District of OregonAmicus brief for Professor Kate StithAmicus brief for the Louisiana Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al.Petitioner's reply Title: Lawnwood Medical Center, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:51 am
Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748.In contrast, in Armistead v Vernitron Corp., 944 F.2d 1287, the Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, affirmed a lower court ruling that held that when a collective bargaining agreement is intended to give retirees with lifetime health and life insurance benefits, such benefits were not subject to unilateral termination.N.B. [read post]