Search for: "Gonzales v. Oregon" Results 41 - 60 of 62
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2013, 3:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
There aren’t many lower court decisions applying the federal and state RFRAs, and there is only one Supreme Court decision applying the federal RFRA, Gonzales v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Salazar Docket: 10-1551 Issue: Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that, under this Court’s decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
The bad news for the friends of federalism is that the 4-4 decision was likely the result of Chief Justice Roberts' recusal: It is difficult to believe that Roberts who joined Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion in Gonzales v Oregon, would tolerate state tort claims rooted in the allegation that a manufacturer committed fraud against the FDA. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am by Christa Culver
AbramsonAmicus brief for Oregon Criminal-Law and Criminal-Procedure ProfessorsAmicus brief for the Federal Public Defender of the District of OregonAmicus brief for Professor Kate StithAmicus brief for the Louisiana Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al.Petitioner's reply Title: Lawnwood Medical Center, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:27 pm by Adam White
Of course, the doctrine is not exclusively of conservative valence: in Gonzales v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
In Descamps, Justice Kagan wrote for the Supreme Court on an issue that permeates our work as federal defenders: what impact do prior convictions have on our clients’ freedom? [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 6:45 am
An interesting wrinkle in the preemption argument, as put forward by the complaining states, is that it expressly relies upon the rationale of Gonzales v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:39 pm by FDABlog HPM
Supreme Court has thwarted a prior Government attempt to define the practice of medicine in Gonzales v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Gonzales (2005) (joined by Justices Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer; Justice Scalia concurred in the judgment). [read post]