Search for: "Gonzales v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 725
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court considers whether to enforce the Second Amendment right to "bear arms" in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 11:07 am by INFORRM
In the Courts The case of Apple v Epic has concluded with Judge Yvonne Gonzales Rogers granting a permanent injunction that said Apple will no longer be allowed to prohibit developers providing links or other communications that direct users away from in app purchasing. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:00 am by Eugene Volokh
RFRA and RLUIPA have been applied by the Supreme Court three times, once allowing a religious exemption along conservative-liberal lines (Hobby Lobby), and twice allowing it unanimously (Gonzales v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 6:49 pm by Jon L. Gelman
The principles of federal preemption are rooted in the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 9:14 am by John Floyd
United States, this court held that, ‘[s]imply stated, habeas is not available to review questions unrelated to the cause of detention. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
"  As the City noted in its brief, "[h]istorically black colleges do not discriminate, for instance, by establishing programs to 'disproportionately appeal to' black students, provided they are 'open to all on a race-neutral basis' (quoting United States v. [read post]
 Hurley, Texas (shorthand for the state challengers), and the Solicitor General (or “SG” for the intervening United States) argue that the insurance requirement cannot be severed and thus the entire ACA must fall. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am by Ronald Collins and David Hudson
It is also manifest in the substance of his opinions, as evidenced by what he wrote in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
 A federal district court judge in Texas has set the starting trial date for the United States v. [read post]