Search for: "Good v. AB Chance Co" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
TOP Logistics and Others [2015] CJEU C-379/14 confirms the principle of Zino Davidoff SA v A & G Imports Ltd [2002] CJEU C-414/99, that goods stored in a warehouse (in this case, Bacardi rum) constitute imported goods as soon as they leave the customs arrangement. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:33 pm
Here, thanks again to the efforts of our dear friend and colleague Alberto Bellan, are the summaries of last week's Katposts which you might not have had a chance to read. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:20 am
This makes good news if you're always in catch-up mode: it won't take too long to bring yourself up to speed! [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Becker’s argument cited several provisions in Article 10 of the operating agreements including: Article 10.3 setting forth the prerequisites for transferring a membership interest and admitting a substitute member including obtaining the written consent of the other members “which consent may be arbitrarily withheld by any such Member”; Article 10.6 providing that any attempted transfer of a membership interest “or any part thereof” not in… [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:57 pm by Nicholas van Aelstyn
  Interestingly, the dissent did agree with the majority that the California Supreme Court’s decision in Sinclair Paint Co. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 4:46 am by Dennis Crouch
I think that SouthButt has a good chance of winning the straight trademark claims based simply on likelihood of confusion. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Becker’s argument cited several provisions in Article 10 of the operating agreements including: Article 10.3 setting forth the prerequisites for transferring a membership interest and admitting a substitute member including obtaining the written consent of the other members “which consent may be arbitrarily withheld by any such Member”; Article 10.6 providing that any attempted transfer of a membership interest “or any part thereof” not in… [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
If a case has been relisted once, it generally means that the Court is paying close attention to the case, and the chances of a grant are higher than for an average case.  [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
If a case has been relisted once, it generally means that the Court is paying close attention to the case, and the chances of a grant are higher than for an average case.  [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
Again http://t.co/y0unOiUO3M -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-07-06: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-06-28: Com… http://t.co/68wn0271oo -> Crass and Offensive Tweets by Student May not Justify Suspension — Rosario v. [read post]