Search for: "Good v. Austin" Results 1 - 20 of 954
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2007, 3:13 am
Police had good defence to unlawful detention claim Austin and Another v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis Court of Appeal “It was lawful only in extreme and exceptional circumstances for the police to contain demonstrators and members of the public caught up in that demonstration who themselves did not appear to be about to commit a breach of the peace. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 10:35 am by Steve Kalar
If the trope, “no news is good news” is true, very good news of late in the Ninth.How to Use: This disappointing decision is not a big surprise, given the Ninth’s decision in Austin. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 5:27 am by Thomas J. Crane
That is an old saying and it applies to the decision in Dillard v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
Tags: Constitutional Law, Election Law, New Opinions, Northwest Austin v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 8:11 am by Gritsforbreakfast
IMO the reason for choosing 50-60 feet instead of, say, 10-15, is that most cell-phone cams don't have a zoom function and can't take good pictures from such a distance, rendering the resulting video all but useless.RELATED: Police v. cameras: A recurring conflict. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:26 am by John L. Welch
District Court for the Western District of Texas (Austin Division), seeking Section 1071(b) review of the TTAB's decision in AQFTM, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:48 am by Gritsforbreakfast
With this blog's interest in junk science, Grits should point out two recent stories regarding women convicted of killing children based on questionable forensics: One so-called "shaken baby" case, which is a highly questionable medical diagnosis created for the sole purpose of prosecution, and another case here in Austin where an expert hired by the defense was so unprofessional he did more harm than good:"Shaken baby syndrome faces new questions in… [read post]
11 May 2013, 5:48 am by INFORRM
The Met accepted that Mr Austin was in fact a “Good Samaritan” with a “public spirited attitude” and apologised for its failure to take adequate steps to remove the posters. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 5:24 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  The case they got good news out of was from the Western District of Texas, Austin Division. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 3:40 am by Rick Rayl
If you happen to be in Austin this week, stop by and see me at the ALI-ABA Eminent Domain Conference. [read post]
2 Oct 2003, 7:11 am
Well maybe not as good at predicting as Johnny Carson's Carnack, but when I reported yesterday on Beasley v. [read post]