Search for: "Good v. State of California" Results 1 - 20 of 8,095
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2021, 4:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the materials in Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 10:13 am
By Matthew Hinks State density bonus law -- one of many California statutes enacted to implement the state's policy of promoting the construction of affordable housing -- has withstood a significant challenge posed by the County of Napa (the "County") in a new California Court of Appeal opinion, Latinos Unidos del Valle de Napa y Solano v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Cal.): 48-1 Alturas MSJ 49-1 State MSJ 50 Alturas Opposition 51 California Opposition 52 Alturas Reply 53 California Reply 55 DCt Order Prior post here on state law claims. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 5:49 pm by H. Scott Leviant
Baseball Associates LLC (April 25, 2019), in which the California Supreme Court clearly discusses the two-stage test for determining whether LMRA preemption under Section 301 applies:Does the claim arise solely from independent state law, or is it based on the collective bargaining agreement (CBA)? [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:38 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The court’s syllabus: Reversing the district court’s summary judgment, the panel held that the State of California did not violate the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act by failing to negotiate in good faith for a tribal-state gaming compact with Big Lagoon Rancheria. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 12:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The result in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 2:33 pm
Message by BSALegal.org on 1/10/2008 EST Boy Scouts of America submitted a friend of the court brief to the California Supreme Court in a case about the interpretation of that state's "Good Samaritan" statute. [read post]
As noted in my last blog post, the California Supreme Court just reversed the appellate court decision in the case of Steiner v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 6:48 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
§ 2710(d)(7)(A)(i), to compel Defendant the State of California (the “State” or “California”) to comply with IGRA’s requirement that it negotiate in good faith with Plaintiff Estom Yumeka Maidu Tribe of the Enterprise Rancheria (“the Tribe”) for the purpose of entering into a tribal-state gaming compact pursuant to IGRA. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:33 am by Jeff Welty
”), and (2) that under the state constitution, there is no good faith exception to the exclusionary rule, State v. [read post]