Search for: "Goode v. Martinis"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2017, 12:16 am
In particular, they alleged that there has been no proper assessment of the impact of the change in law, it is discriminatory as against natural persons, and there is no good reason for it.Sky pointed out that the defence was originally only intended to apply to natural persons but was construed as covering legal entities as well by the CJEU in the Anheuser-Busch v Buddejovickybudvar (C-245/02 [2004] ECR-I-10989). [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 6:06 am
That’s what happened here but, like with a good martini, there is a little twist added. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
Sentencing is scheduled for early November (U.S. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 11:57 am
Available from: Condition: Good ! [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Curtis Joyner's 10-page opinion in Holsworth v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 10:00 am
See Obregon v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 6:12 am
Ideological snits and quarrels are goods upon which a high value may be placed. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 7:41 pm
Marineau v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:26 am
Entm’t 200, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 9:09 pm
Fed.R.Crim.P. 23(b)(3) permits a jury of 11 jurors to return a verdict "if the court finds good cause to excuse a juror. [read post]
25 May 2009, 11:42 am
The Curious Case of Levy v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
Indeed, she provides an array of legal actions involving Quakers, perhaps most famously, Tinker v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
Indeed, she provides an array of legal actions involving Quakers, perhaps most famously, Tinker v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 5:08 am
-Dieter Martiny on the PIL dimensions of the 2010 agreement between France and Germany on a new optional matrimonial property regime. - Horatia Muir Watt on the follow-up to Kiobel (the case of Sexual Minorities v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:10 am
They had a price fix lunch with twenty five cent martinis. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:10 am
They had a price fix lunch with twenty five cent martinis. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
At the time this decision was rendered, the court was applying Askey v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:30 am
Plaintiff has never authorized Defendants to use the MAFIA WARS mark, sell Virtual Goods for use in the Game, or transfer Virtual Goods that Defendants have “sold” to players through the Infringing Websites.Zynga Game Network Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:13 pm
A martini perhaps, or a real pillow, but not ice chips... [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:34 am
It could be argued, as in the Onassis v. [read post]
