Search for: "Goode v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 16,384
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2010, 10:16 am
by Sara Davidson The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an opinion on April 1, 2010 that provides a compass for companies like eBay to navigate the murky waters of trademark infringement in the e-commerce marketplace.  [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 11:03 am
The application for the FISC order was personally approved by John Ashcroft, then the Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:03 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
  However, this is the first such suit filed in a United States court, raising the question of whether the suit could succeed under the laws of California and the United States, including the First Amendment. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:03 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
  However, this is the first such suit filed in a United States court, raising the question of whether the suit could succeed under the laws of California and the United States, including the First Amendment. [read post]
24 May 2006, 11:42 am
United Kingdom (or in .doc).Post on Case C-423/04, Richards v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:59 am by Eric Osterberg
United States and Miss United States of America : The potential loss of good will and customers by plaintiff, and possible damage to its reputation, as a result of defendants’ alleged infringement of plaintiff’s marks is not easily quantifiable or remediable by damages, and supports a finding of irreparable harm. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:21 am
Jessie Weber passes along word that the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled in her favor today in Daniels v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 7:56 am by Joe Virene
”  However, when it comes to determining the applicability of the Federal Arbitration Act, the United States Supreme Court recently held non-competes should be treated the same as any other contract The Nitro-Lift Decision In Nitro-Lift Technologies, L.L.C. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:16 am
That is a big deal.And, finally, the Court's opinion in United Haulers (not Part II.D) reaffirms that Exxon is still good law. [read post]