Search for: "Goodwin v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 452
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm by admin
Emerging areas in Psychology, Data, and Statistical Sciences Gary Marchant, Lincoln Professor of Emerging Technologies, Law and Ethics, at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, moderated panelists: Xiao-Li Meng, the Whipple V. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:03 am by Lynn Jokela
Cydney Posner’s blog provides a good overview of the lawsuit and notes that it’s patterned after the lawsuit challenging California’s board gender diversity law, SB 826: Framed as a “taxpayer suit” much like Crest v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am by Schachtman
Schepers, “The Biological Action of Talc and Other Silicate Minerals,” in Goodwin, Proceedings on the Symposium on Talc; U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:15 pm by jkim
Starting in the late 1960s and early 1970s, as the welfare state retracted, perceived social problems were recast as criminal problems. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
 In this plantworker case, I represented Carey-Canada in what turned out to be one of its last cases in the United States, before filing for bankruptcy. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 00665-20 Enticknap v The Gazette (North East, Middlesbrough & Teeside), 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication. 00624-20 Oldfield v North Wales Pioneer, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 00464-20 Goodwin v County Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, on 3… [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:00 am
Goodwin for the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia denied defendant’s motion to dismiss medical monitoring claims related to ethylene oxide (“EtO”) emissions in Letart v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 5:55 am by Anita Bernstein
June Medical Services LLC in this appellate incarnation has approved a law with no beneficial effect (unless one thinks that blocking lawful abortion is good for health, a motive for state action that Roe v. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 7:10 pm by Gerard Magliocca
One important but less-well-known Marshall Court opinion was United States v. [read post]