Search for: "Gordon v State" Results 221 - 240 of 1,570
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Use in the court of trade As stated above, the most interesting point discussed by Sir Alastair Norris was whether the activities of Merck US constituted use in the UK in the course of trade. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As McClain describes, this back and forth was clearly on display in Loving v. [read post]
While the plaintiff’s filing of an application to register the SULKA mark in the United States was “certainly relevant” to intent to market products in the United States, it had little bearing on his ability to expand his business to the United States (Selah v. [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
United States Tulsi Gabbard, a U.S. congresswoman from Hawaii, dropped a defamation lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, according to a court filing. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
”[5] This rejection of the clear demands of a statute has infected even the intermediate appellate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:09 pm by Giles Peaker
(v) Their needs in terms of locality to maintain employment and or family support. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
” To name a few: The report recommends ensuring the independence and professional protection of the “540F judge advocate” while sustaining the ability of the current convening authority to submit a statement outlining his or her considered opinion about how the crime and its prosecution affects discipline, efficiency, and morale; the report highlights the need for an independent “court administrative office,” like the U.K. uses, to manage arranging for the venue, timing… [read post]
Case date: 20 April 2020 Case number: No. 18-56221 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Madison, and the Missouri Crisis are told alongside less familiar ones like Martin v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
  Nicklin J ruled that the meaning of Murray’s tweet was that Riley “had publicly stated in a tweet that he [Mr Corbyn] deserved to be violently attacked”. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 3:26 am by CMS
Background 126 claimants brought a group litigation action against the defendant bank in respect of alleged sexual assaults committed by Dr Gordon Bates. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:29 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” [Note how Rogers is slowly collapsing into transformativeness in the Ninth Circuit—continuing Gordon v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:34 am by John W. Scanlan
The claims had been brought in good faith and the litigation was still at a very early stage (SnugglyCat, Inc. v. [read post]