Search for: "Gordon v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 697
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2012, 4:00 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:01 am
Anthony, Federal Judicial Center (2005) United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 3:07 pm
Gordon to as much incarceration as defendants in other ivory smuggling cases, including relatedcases.AUSA LaVerne disagreed with these arguments, expressing in the prosecution's memorandum,An appropriate sentence must reflect, in particular, (i) the seriousness of this offense, which is increasingly the focus of national and global law enforcement and policy efforts; (ii) the importance of general deterrence, which courts have recognized has special relevance in this context; (iii) the… [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:44 am
The “ministerial exception” is a religious protection based in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
In 1995, the United States launched the first NAFTA trade challenge.[9] It was the first and only NAFTA Chapter 20 Canada-U.S. dispute as the agreement’s state-to-state provisions fell into disuse. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
The facilitative conception originated in the earliest years of the Republic, was sensitive to the legitimate interests and activities of the states, and contributed to the construction of the early United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:21 pm
Micron Tech., Inc., Civil Action No. 16-11249-WGY, initially filed in United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:06 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:18 pm
Thinking about suing an agency of the United States? [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 3:33 pm
Federal prosecutors in the eastern district of New York last week secured a conviction in the case of United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 12:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 8:57 pm
Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), begins: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:07 pm
If true, it would be difficult to see how the prosecution could secure a conviction in light of United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
30 May 2023, 7:52 am
Here are the briefs in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 4:37 pm
Instradent USA, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 17-2256, 13 September 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:35 am
In his book, Gordon Martin focuses on the lives and experiences of courageous black citizens of Forrest County, Mississippi who served as witnesses in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:51 am
United States v. [read post]
