Search for: "Gore v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2017, 3:58 am by NCC Staff
“The only question in Bush versus Gore was whether the presidency would be decided by the Florida Supreme Court or the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
 2, of the United States Constitution and failing to comply with 3 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
 2, of the United States Constitution and failing to comply with 3 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:45 am by Lawrence Solum
Gore that the state could not arbitrarily value one person’s vote over that of another might be used to force states to improve their election processes through litigation. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 3:58 am by NCC Staff
“The only question in Bush versus Gore was whether the presidency would be decided by the Florida Supreme Court or the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 2:55 am by Walter Olson
Tags: best of, claims fraud, Florida, WO writings Fraud week V: lucrative gore is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 5:07 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Ethan Wood We told you to “Beware of Strips and Gores” back in 2012 and today we bring you Green et al v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 8:32 am by Jonathan H. Adler
But in the last few years the opinion has been resurrected by the United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, the federal appellate court that includes Ohio.  [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:11 am by Nate Persily
My contribution -- “‘Celebrating’ the Tenth Anniversary of the 2000 Election Controversy: What the World Can Learn from the Recent History of Election Dysfunction in the United States” – is available here. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 1:12 am
United States, holding that U.S. citizens of Japanese ancestry citizens could be summarily relocated to detention camps during WW II based solely on their race.In fact, Bush v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 11:37 am
  The United States Supreme Court has held that ‘an erroneous or mistaken performance of a statutory duty, although a violationh of the statute, is not without more a denial of the equal protection of the laws” (relying on the Justices’ rulng in 1944 in Snowden v . [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:29 pm by Daniel
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit released an opinion in the case of Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 1:02 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Litigation in select counties started additional recounts, and this litigation ultimately reached the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate on August 2, 1979. [read post]