Search for: "Gossett v. Gossett" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Last Tuesday, at an event sponsored by the Supreme Court Historical Society, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg asked Richard Primus and Randy Barnett how each would have decided Loving v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by ernst
”   A scholars' brief on "the History and Original Meaning of the Fourth Amendment as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner in Carpenter v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm by pscamp01
This issue’s (volume 39, number 2) article was written by Jessie Steffan while she was a law student (she is now a clerk at the District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri) and it won the Supreme Court Historical Society’s 2013 Hughes-Gossett student prize. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm by pscamp01
This issue’s (volume 39, number 2) article was written by Jessie Steffan while she was a law student (she is now a clerk at the District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri) and it won the Supreme Court Historical Society’s 2013 Hughes-Gossett student prize. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:24 pm by Schachtman
The new Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence contains a sly reference and endorsement to a book by the two would-be statistics experts who submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in Mattrix Initiatives v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
As Keyssar observes of the failure of the proportionalist Lodge-Gossett reform of 1950 (led by the liberal Republican senator Henry Cabot Lodge of Massachusetts and the Texas segregationist representative Ed Lee Gossett): “an institutional reform that, in itself, had long been regarded as democratic, might well have anti-democratic consequences in a nation containing a large region that lacked universal suffrage” (164). [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 12:29 pm
Before this decision, it was up to an employee to prove that they were wrongfully fired and this was often very difficult to do because most employers will not say, “I'm firing you because you're black' or 'because you're over 40,''' said Wade Cowan, the attorney for the plaintiff in the case, Gossett v. [read post]