Search for: "Gottlieb v Gottlieb" Results 361 - 380 of 400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2018, 6:01 am
Posted by Vishal Gupta, Sandra Mortal, and Xiaohu Guo (University of Alabama), on Saturday, April 21, 2018 Tags: Compensation ratios, Diversity, Executive Compensation, Management Corporate Governance Deviance Posted by Ruth V. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:17 am
Preston and Michael James, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Sunday, November 10, 2019 Tags: Asset management, Capital markets, ESG, Impact investing, International governance, Shareholder activism Understanding the Impact of America’s Clampdown on Proxy Advisors Posted by Amy Freedman, Michael Fein, and Ian Robertson, Kingsdale Advisors, on Sunday, November 10, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Institutional… [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:09 am by Peter Mahler
Add to the growing list of equity-driven rulings for these contract-centric creatures of statute an unpublished decision last week by a New Jersey intermediate appellate court in All Saints University of Medicine Aruba v Chilana, No. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 5:12 am
Mercante, a partner at Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman, analyze the recent Supreme Court decision in Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:19 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Rather than rely upon direct New York authority applying common-law dissolution to LLCs, the petitioner analogized to prior instances of New York courts applying equitable / common-law principles to find remedies that do not exist as a matter of statute: Lyons v Salamone, 32 AD3d 757 [1st Dept 2006]: the Court announced that courts may, upon dissolution, order an equitable buyout of one LLC member by another in lieu of liquidation Tzolis v Wolff, 10 NY3d 100 [2008]: the Court ruled… [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:48 am by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the government of Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts The trial in the case of Hourani v Thomson concluded on 13 February 2017. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 3:51 am
In my world, the Court could just say (i) yes, RAM breached; (ii) the "harm" resulting from the alleged breach is difference between the value of the merger consideration and, lets say, the cover bid; (iii) such damages are calculable and equal to $X; (iv) money damages, being easily measured, are the preferred remedy; and (iv) to the extent $X exceeds a voluntary limitation on money damages you can't now complain that a damages award will not make you whole; (v) you can… [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm by Sabrina Minhas
Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Franklin v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:07 am by Peter Mahler
Another is Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484, 10 N.Y.S.3d 2 [read post]