Search for: "Gottshall v. Consolidated Rail Corp."
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2014, 2:40 pm
Maersk moved for a judgment as a matter of law, alleging that Skye’s injuries were not cognizable under the Jones Act based on Consolidated Rail Corp. v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:00 am
The precedent that guided the Eleventh Circuit was a Federal Employers Liability Act (“FELA”) case called Consolidated Rail Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 10:30 am
” The court said that under federal maritime law, plaintiffs seeking to recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress must satisfy the “zone of danger” test set forth in Consolidated Rail Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 7:00 am
., Claimant was not in the “zone of danger” set forth in Consolidated Rail Corp. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 2:24 pm
Buckley, 521 U.S. 424, 433 (1997). [9] Id. at 433 (quoting Consolidated Rail Corp. v. [read post]
