Search for: "Gould v. Gould"
Results 41 - 60
of 950
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:59 am
McGinity v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:29 am
Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:33 pm
Gould, IV, Charles A. [read post]
30 May 2023, 6:43 am
In Gould v Kontogiorge, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2023 WL 3633433, 2023 N.Y. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:05 pm
Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
The University of Southern California [USC] Gould School of Law has created an "English Medieval Legal Documents Database, A Compilation of Published Sources from 600 to 1535" which it has posted on the Internet. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
The University of Southern California [USC] Gould School of Law has created an "English Medieval Legal Documents Database, A Compilation of Published Sources from 600 to 1535" which it has posted on the Internet. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:36 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:21 pm
v=rqDCieiDWAE Check out the newsletter at ChinaTalk.media! [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am
Say what you would about Roe v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
SAS Inst. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Whether petitioner intends to publish the information on a publicly available website is irrelevant to the applicability of the exemption since "access to government records does not depend on the purpose for which the records are sought" (Matter of Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, 274 [1996]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 59 AD3d 353, 355 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Whether petitioner intends to publish the information on a publicly available website is irrelevant to the applicability of the exemption since "access to government records does not depend on the purpose for which the records are sought" (Matter of Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, 274 [1996]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 59 AD3d 353, 355 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:49 pm
Gould and Mark J. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:29 am
Judge Graber, joined by Judges Gould and Watford, in No on E, San Franciscans Opposing the Affordable Housing Production Act v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Gould v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 8:25 am
Depending on whether a lower court finding is moot, the petition added, it also may be necessary for the SEC to show that it would be infeasible to distribute any disgorgement award to harmed investors (Goulding v. [read post]
