Search for: "Gould v. Gould" Results 81 - 100 of 797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2007, 11:55 am
(Judge Duffy, sitting by designation, makes a similar mistake in his dissent, but it's both less obvious and less relevant to his basic point.)So please, please, please, Judges Ferris and Gould. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm by Patricia Salkin
Based on the record before the court, the court held that the Board’s determination could not be described as legally untenable, or unreasonable, whimsical, capricious or arbitrary. 11 Gould St., LLC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:19 am
 Because Judge Smith has a total of four votes (including his own) for his proposed disposition, and then he gets three others (Judges Kozinski, Graber, and Gould) -- a total of seven -- to join that particular portion of his disposition.So you've got to skip around opinions to find the actual holdings.For The Three, Judge Gould writes a concurring opinion (for himself and Judges Kozinski and Graber) explaining their theory. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 1:10 pm
A phrase that's simultaneously more accurate but that indicates that Judge Gould's final argument in favor of remand doesn't really say much of anything that anyone disagrees with (though at least doesn't say anything wrong). [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:42 pm
 The panel consists of Judges Gould, Clifton and Watford. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 4:00 pm by Lawrence Solum
Kerr (University of Southern California Gould School of Law) has posted Initial Reactions to Carpenter v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 1:52 pm
It may well be that 2009 was the "Year of the Ponzi Scheme," and Judge Gould makes a reference to exactly that in the second footnote of his opinion. [read post]