Search for: "Gould v. Gould" Results 101 - 120 of 997
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2021, 2:33 pm
of the opinion:"A variation on this view culminated in Brandenburg v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:42 am by Rohini Kurup
On April 27, the Supreme Court agreed to take up United States v. [read post]
Disputes over rights to the Colorado River are supposed to be reserved for the US Supreme Court according to the decision in Arizona v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm by Adam Faderewski
He received his law degree from the USC Gould School of Law and was admitted to the Texas Bar in 2009. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 11:37 am
Gould Holding:  In the absence of a petition for dissolution, demand for appointment of a receiver does not trigger the statutory right, under §4-603(a) of the Corporations & Associations Article of the Maryland Code, to purchase the complainant’s stock in the subject company. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Gould v Decolator, 121 AD3d 845, the Appellate Division observed that the Police District had submitted documentary evidence conclusively establishing that the Petitioners' causes of action insofar as asserted against it were barred by the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“To succeed on a motion to dismiss based upon documentary evidence pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), the documentary evidence must utterly refute the plaintiff’s factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law” (Gould v Decolator, 121 AD3d 845, 847; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88). [read post]
As set out in Prop. 22 (Art.9.), the law can be amended by seven-eighths majority; a threshold that drew dismay from Professor William Gould IV: ‘“I’ve never seen anything like that. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As the Court of Appeals held in Fappiano v New York City Police Dept., 95 NY2d 738, "[a]ll government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempted from disclosure as provided in the Public Officers Law" and further explained in Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, a government agency may withhold records sought pursuant to FOIL only if it "articulate[s] particularized and specific justification for not… [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As the Court of Appeals held in Fappiano v New York City Police Dept., 95 NY2d 738, "[a]ll government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempted from disclosure as provided in the Public Officers Law" and further explained in Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, a government agency may withhold records sought pursuant to FOIL only if it "articulate[s] particularized and specific justification for not… [read post]