Search for: "Gould v. Gould"
Results 101 - 120
of 940
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Gould v New York CityPolice Dept., 89 NY2d 267, the Appellate Division noted that "All government records are ... presumptively open for public inspection and copying unless they fall within one of the enumerated exemptions of Public Officers Law §87(2)", typically referred to as FOIL. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Gould v New York CityPolice Dept., 89 NY2d 267, the Appellate Division noted that "All government records are ... presumptively open for public inspection and copying unless they fall within one of the enumerated exemptions of Public Officers Law §87(2)", typically referred to as FOIL. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Gould v New York CityPolice Dept., 89 NY2d 267, the Appellate Division noted that "All government records are ... presumptively open for public inspection and copying unless they fall within one of the enumerated exemptions of Public Officers Law §87(2)", typically referred to as FOIL. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Gould v New York CityPolice Dept., 89 NY2d 267, the Appellate Division noted that "All government records are ... presumptively open for public inspection and copying unless they fall within one of the enumerated exemptions of Public Officers Law §87(2)", typically referred to as FOIL. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 2:47 am
Gang Cao v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:18 pm
Gould, 2016 WL 1559271 (E.D. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:03 am
In Goulding v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:03 am
In Goulding v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 2:33 pm
of the opinion:"A variation on this view culminated in Brandenburg v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 3:48 am
" In re Gould Paper Corp., 834 F.2d 1017, 5 USPQ2d 1110, 1112 (Fed. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:06 am
Case citation: Maffick LLC v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 1:57 am
Disputes over rights to the Colorado River are supposed to be reserved for the US Supreme Court according to the decision in Arizona v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 9:30 am
Sanchez v. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:08 am
Schneider v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 11:37 am
Gould Holding: In the absence of a petition for dissolution, demand for appointment of a receiver does not trigger the statutory right, under §4-603(a) of the Corporations & Associations Article of the Maryland Code, to purchase the complainant’s stock in the subject company. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 1:05 am
” Lozano v. [read post]