Search for: "Gould v. Gould"
Results 121 - 140
of 950
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2021, 12:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 1:05 am
” Lozano v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
" Citing Gould v Decolator, 121 AD3d 845, the Appellate Division observed that the Police District had submitted documentary evidence conclusively establishing that the Petitioners' causes of action insofar as asserted against it were barred by the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:07 am
“To succeed on a motion to dismiss based upon documentary evidence pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), the documentary evidence must utterly refute the plaintiff’s factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law” (Gould v Decolator, 121 AD3d 845, 847; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88). [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm
As set out in Prop. 22 (Art.9.), the law can be amended by seven-eighths majority; a threshold that drew dismay from Professor William Gould IV: ‘“I’ve never seen anything like that. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Fappiano v New York City Police Dept., 95 NY2d 738, "[a]ll government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempted from disclosure as provided in the Public Officers Law" and further explained in Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, a government agency may withhold records sought pursuant to FOIL only if it "articulate[s] particularized and specific justification for not… [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 12:00 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Fappiano v New York City Police Dept., 95 NY2d 738, "[a]ll government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempted from disclosure as provided in the Public Officers Law" and further explained in Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, a government agency may withhold records sought pursuant to FOIL only if it "articulate[s] particularized and specific justification for not… [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 4:20 pm
Canada Zoutman v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 6:04 pm
An example of this occurred in the case of Gould & Lamb, LLC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:09 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:25 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 1:19 pm
Here are the two paragraphs in which Judge Gould describes how the case got to the Ninth Circuit:"In response to Castillo’s Motion for Class Certification, the district court found that Castillo had satisfied the requirements of commonality and typicality under FRCP 23(a)(2)–(3), but not predominance under FRCP 23(b)(3). [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 5:28 pm
The Court, in its questioning, explored the theory that the injured employee could possibly be entitled to overtime pay for working for the benefit of the employer on the weekend, and in excess of the normal work hours.A-48-19 Kim Goulding v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 9:37 am
V. involving an infringement claim of Eli Lily’s pemetrexed patents. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
(See Crawford v Himmelstein, 2011 WL 2552326 [Sup Ct, NY County 2011], citing Wexler v Shea & Gould, 211 AD2d 450 [1st Dept 1995].) [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Along these lines, it is easy to read Chiafalo v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:52 pm
Gould, IVYes. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 8:30 am
I am pleased to announce the 2020-21 lineup for the University of Pennsylvania Legal History Workshop: October 1, 2020: Melissa Murray (New York University School of Law)“Race-ing Roe: Reproductive Justice, Racial Justice, and the Battle for Roe v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 7:18 pm
Gould IV, Charles A. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 4:11 pm
European Court of Human RightsMarina v. [read post]
