Search for: "Governing Board v. Felt" Results 21 - 40 of 416
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2015, 3:09 pm by John C. Manoog III
The idea of holding a person, business, or government accountable for harm that can be felt but not seen is nothing new. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 12:02 pm
 See [Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio] V(13)(C)(4) and (5).Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:43 am by Eric Goldman
Bleeping Computer runs a computer support message board that included discussions about anti-malware programs. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 7:59 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Patrick Smith/Getty ImagesPenn State's board of trustees felt it had no other option other than to fire Joe Paterno. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 6:41 am by Joy Waltemath
In San Manuel, the Board adopted a framework, based on principles first enumerated by the Ninth Circuit in Donovan v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:20 am by Robert A. Levy
Because the conventional approach to judicial review is to scrutinize government regulations only if they infringe on a fundamental right, the Ninth Circuit felt it necessary to categorize the right at issue in Raich.  [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:42 am by boston
As we’ve said many times at Americans United, it would be best if government at all levels refrained from sponsoring official acts of prayer and worship.But the Supreme Court felt differently. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am by Russell Spivak
But Judge Hellerstein felt that this case presented a novel problem. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 3:15 pm
In addition, the Parole Board gave the petitioner an opportunity to highlight or discuss any matter he felt warranted the Board's attention. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:43 am by Seth Borden
National Labor Relations Board, Nos. 14-2405/2558 (6th Cir., July 1, 2015), the panel strongly questioned the recent jurisprudence in this area, but felt constrained by another panel’s decision weeks earlier in NLRB v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 11:34 am by brown
Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.Seemingly unsatisfied with the damage caused by Greece, Scalia and Thomas apparently felt the need to explain once again why they think coercive religious activities on the part of government are not actually the same as an establishment of religion.Yesterday, the Supreme Court once again considered an AU-sponsored case – Doe v. [read post]