Search for: "Governing Board v. Felt" Results 41 - 60 of 570
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2010, 7:21 pm
Events in Indian corporate governance that occurred starting January 2009 have spurred academic research on the role and effect of independent directors on corporate boards. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am by Russell Spivak
But Judge Hellerstein felt that this case presented a novel problem. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:07 am by John Jascob
Few pieces of wide-ranging legislation come together so quickly as did the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, but when Congress senses a felt need, it can move with surprising speed.The SEC Historical Society today presented a panel titled The Sarbanes-Oxley Act at 20: A Corporate Governance Legacy featuring many of the key players at the SEC who implemented the Congressional mandate on corporate governance meant to reassure investors that public company financial statements could again… [read post]
6 May 2014, 2:05 pm by Christopher Lund
The Supreme Court yesterday decided Town of Greece v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 3:15 pm
In addition, the Parole Board gave the petitioner an opportunity to highlight or discuss any matter he felt warranted the Board's attention. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 4:49 pm by Patricia Salkin
Balm Road Investment, LLC v Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners, 2020 WL 413683 (FL App. 2/11/2022) [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:54 am by Hannah Kris
The editorial board felt that forcing judges to be appointed by political actors diversifies the bench and eliminates an opaque administrative state, a view contested by Justice Breyer, who felt that civil servants form the backbone of a functioning government. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 10:51 am
On the dissent’s view, if the governing boards conclude that drawing racial distinctions in university admissions is undesirable or counterproductive, they are permissibly exercising their policymaking authority. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:03 am
A government entity is not held liable unless it has a policy or practice that violates constitutional rights, and there was no evidence that the Sheridan school board had such a policy. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:59 am
It says the board "must be satisfied that the degree of exceptionality is the same as, or is approximately the same as, in the facts found in the case of Steel and Morris v United Kingdom. [read post]