Search for: "Government Employees Insurance Company v. Poole"
Results 1 - 20
of 99
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2011, 7:30 am
Thus Simpson may have enjoyed insurance coverage under the Virginia Municipal Liability Pool, Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) and/or National Grange Mutual Insurance policies implicated if he simply had testified at the declaratory judgment hearing that he had left his cruiser, siren and lights on to avoid potential car accident by alerting oncoming motorists while taking the criminal into custody. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
Employee Each jurisdiction has its own statutes and regulations governing employee and independent contractor relationships and set forth the legal requirements under workers’ compensation laws. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 1:49 pm
[I explain in this post why the claim of a substantial burden on religious exercise would be even more attenuated with respect to an “insured” plan, in which the insurance company itself makes the payments for reimbursement of covered services.]3. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
If the ACA’s combination of government-subsidized insurance for employees plus government-imposed taxes on employers really is better for both the employer and the employee, then shouldn’t every large employer in the country that’s economically rational immediately drop its insurance plan (and force the taxpayers to bear the cost of their employees’ insurance)? [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:44 am
Read more… Court Closes Workers Compensation Loophole for Staffing Companies A recent Massachusetts court decision upheld efforts by staffing companies and workers compensation insurers to close a loophole that allowed staffing-firm employees injured at a client company both to collect workers compensation benefits and to sue the company where they were hurt.
The Superior Court for the Commonwealth of… [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:26 am
In Sun Capital Partners III, L.P. et al. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am
Like insurance companies, homeowners’ associations and utility companies, unions pool money contributed by many stakeholders and spend it to provide services and to engage in expressive activity. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am
Examples of fringe costs include costs incurred for vacations, sick leave, holidays, military leave, employer pension and 401(k) contributions, payroll and unemployment taxes, insurance, and other employee benefits. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
As public interest and scrutiny into environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues continue to rise, companies face an ever-evolving landscape relating to their ESG disclosures. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 2:36 pm
In their class action complaint filed in 2018, the drivers asserted that the company misclassified them as independent contractors instead of employees and that the deductions taken by the company from their pay, particularly deductions for customer damage claims and insurance coverage, violated the Massachusetts Wage Act. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:20 am
[v] They also suggest that the breadth of the “associated person” definition might mean that employees/consultants/advisers of a subsidiary in a non-UK jurisdiction, are regarded as “associated persons” of the UK parent company. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 6:40 am
Government Employees Insurance Company". [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 10:26 am
In Sun Capital Partners III, L.P. et al. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 10:12 am
—Mahatma Gandhi 1Lloyd’s America v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act’s (ERISA) sweeping preemptive force is cabined by a savings statute that allows the business of insurance to escape federal employee benefit plan regulation. [read post]
28 May 2015, 12:26 am
In Vialpando v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
Less well known are efforts to encourage reporting of ESG factors by companies and discussions over the content and meaning of those terms. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 2:37 pm
The Trump administration ended the requirement that large companies report to the government what they pay employees by race and gender, a rule that aimed to close the gender wage gap. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 7:40 am
” Lamden v. [read post]
