Search for: "Government Employees v. Windsor"
Results 1 - 20
of 102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
The first is the extent to which the governing statutes displace negotiated contract terms and general contractual doctrines. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 6:24 am
A prime example of this is the Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 4:54 am
The only entity with employees is the property manager entity, Solil Management LLC, a New York LLC. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:43 am
So, he says that Nixon v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
[5] Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change, Release No. 33-9106 (Feb. 2, 2010) [75 FR 6290 (Feb. 8, 2010)] [6] See Basic Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
(Although as a general matter, voting within state and local government must follow the one-person, one-vote rule of Reynolds v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the 2022 case that overturned Roe v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
”[1] Courts have used that doctrine to create a rapidly-changing body of legal interpretation while, at the same time, the various levels of government create new laws and, as importantly, new regulations at a rate that taxes the brainpower of some of the country’s best lawyers. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:43 am
Windsor (excerpted in the 1978 Digest of U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Accordingly, passage of the RFMA would be useful insurance in the event that the Court overrules Windsor and/or Obergefell--as Justice Thomas made clear he would like the Court to do in his concurrence in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Windsor, the Respect for Marriage Act would codify a repeal of the unconstitutional law. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 10:07 am
Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
Windsor, striking down the federal Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 9:36 am
Then, of course, there were also terms in which the court upheld the charging of fees by unions to government employees who did not wish to join (Abood v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 2:45 am
Supreme Court released its landmark decision BOSTOCK v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
On October 25 & 26, Windsor Law proudly hosted the 2019 conference of the Canadian Association for Legal Ethics. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
Zarda and Bostock were consolidated in the Supreme Court, and the Harris Funeral Home case, involving former employee Aimee Stephens, remains a stand-alone case.The Supreme Court is a majestic building, constructed in the 1930s, when government buildings stood for something. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 2:28 pm
In Lam v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
What has changed and why Some 15 years ago, the Deans of Osgoode, Ottawa, Queens, Western and Windsor commissioned a Study of Accessibility to Ontario Law Schools (the “2004 Study”) . [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
