Search for: "Government Employees v. Windsor"
Results 41 - 60
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2013, 4:27 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:16 pm
Keays v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
In 2005, one year after a Republican administration took the reins of State government, Keith Hall and Joel Schrader, Back's supervisors, fired her. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Windsor, 133 S. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:13 pm
Moore v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
And the Court’s ruling in Windsor v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:48 am
In addition, governments and businesses now know that their constituents and employees will continue to suffer under the nation’s patchwork approach to marriage rights for the foreseeable future. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:59 pm
Windsor, the U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 9:06 am
Windsor, the U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:52 am
Windsor, the U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
Windsor, the U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:20 am
Windsor, the U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:28 am
Windsor, the federal government did not recognize same sex marriages. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:15 am
Windsor and DOMA. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm
” Coker v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Accordingly, passage of the RFMA would be useful insurance in the event that the Court overrules Windsor and/or Obergefell--as Justice Thomas made clear he would like the Court to do in his concurrence in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Given the federal government’s usual practice of deferring to state determinations of marital status when administering federal laws and programs, its sudden refusal to give effect to one class of marriage, for every federal-law purpose, was a discrimination of an “unusual character” that raised an inference of animus and violated the Constitution.Based on Windsor, the city attorney for the City of Houston advised the mayor that the City “may extend… [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 9:02 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
In its 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:14 am
You’re Employees Now. [read post]
