Search for: "Government Employees v. Windsor"
Results 61 - 80
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2011, 8:02 am
Office of Personnel Management and Windsor v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
Const., Amdt. 5; Bolling v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:08 am
Plaintiff Edith Schain Windsor also filed a petition for certiorari before judgment in her DOMA challenge, Windsor v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:25 am
(United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
Office of Personnel Management and Windsor v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
On October 25 & 26, Windsor Law proudly hosted the 2019 conference of the Canadian Association for Legal Ethics. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:41 pm
The stories of women involved in the case, Dukes v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:49 pm
Windsor, 570 U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
Sekhar v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:16 am
Brown) and Windsor v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm
Windsor, which was a victory for Verrilli as well. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:43 pm
In addition, civil rights organizations have asked the Court bo bypass the Second Circuit Court, to review another DOMA challenge — Windsor v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
The Obama Administration declined to defend Section 3 of DOMA in Windsor. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:33 pm
In United States v Windsor (Dkt No 12-307), the petitioner contends that DOMA has denied gays and lesbians who have been allowed to marry lawfully in certain states all of the benefits and protections that married couples enjoy under federal law. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
And, motor vehicle technology is still increasing the legal infrastructure necessary to regulate its use adequately—infrastructure that includes not only the volume of laws, regulations, and national and international standards of performance, but also the size of police forces, and the number of government departments, courts, judges, court administrative staff employees, and the number of lawyers, and the involvement of companies providing insurance, construction, and other… [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
Koontz v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 2:28 pm
In Lam v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
The BIA receives it for demonstrating repeatedly that despite their members' unfortunate positioning as Justice Department employees who report to the Attorney General rather than truly independent jurists, they can and do rule on the law against the federal government regularly. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 4:57 am
From a regulatory perspective, he inherits a full plate, with WHD rules expected on the Part 541 exemptions, the Executive Order increasing the minimum wages to be paid to employees on certain government contracts, and the implementation of U.S. v. [read post]
