Search for: "Government Employees v. Windsor"
Results 61 - 80
of 119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2014, 4:57 am
From a regulatory perspective, he inherits a full plate, with WHD rules expected on the Part 541 exemptions, the Executive Order increasing the minimum wages to be paid to employees on certain government contracts, and the implementation of U.S. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm
Windsor, which was a victory for Verrilli as well. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:25 pm
Judge Mark Bennett entered a consent decree on February, 28, 2014, resolving the brought by the EEOC in EEOC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:06 am
First, as applied to the federal government, RFRA falls within Congress’s enumerated powers, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s decision in City of Boerne v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm
Windsor, 570 U.S. ___, 133 S. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
The BIA receives it for demonstrating repeatedly that despite their members' unfortunate positioning as Justice Department employees who report to the Attorney General rather than truly independent jurists, they can and do rule on the law against the federal government regularly. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 4:27 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:59 pm
Windsor, the U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 5:16 pm
Windsor on their family leave and employee benefit plan obligations to employees involved in same-sex domestic partnership relationships. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 8:04 pm
(Dale Carpenter) The effect of United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 7:20 am
While the ruling in Windsor v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Specifically, this holding affects spousal rights under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) that governs health and retirement benefits and the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) that governs medical leave. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
Windsor, a U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:21 pm
By Karin Johnson and Megan Grant* When the Supreme Court issued its opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
In a landmark ruling, United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 6:48 am
Supreme Court’s June 26 decision in United States v. [read post]
