Search for: "Government Employees v. Windsor"
Results 61 - 80
of 131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2014, 9:13 pm
Moore v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 7:55 am
Tibble v Edison, now up before the Supreme Court, and the history of excessive fee class action litigation presents a nice way of looking at this phenomenon. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:48 am
In addition, governments and businesses now know that their constituents and employees will continue to suffer under the nation’s patchwork approach to marriage rights for the foreseeable future. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
Place of Celebration to Govern Under the current FMLA regulations, the definition of spouse is based on the state where the employee resides, not on the state where the employee was married. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:11 pm
That much was made clear in the Supreme Court of Canada decision Caimaw v. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 9:02 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:22 am
Last year, in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
DOJ reports on post-Windsor efforts. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:28 pm
Windsor. [read post]
28 May 2014, 7:33 am
The case is called Boucher v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
Windsor, 570 U.S. ___, 133 S.Ct. 2675 2013). [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:49 pm
Windsor, 570 U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 4:57 am
From a regulatory perspective, he inherits a full plate, with WHD rules expected on the Part 541 exemptions, the Executive Order increasing the minimum wages to be paid to employees on certain government contracts, and the implementation of U.S. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm
Windsor, which was a victory for Verrilli as well. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:25 pm
Judge Mark Bennett entered a consent decree on February, 28, 2014, resolving the brought by the EEOC in EEOC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:06 am
First, as applied to the federal government, RFRA falls within Congress’s enumerated powers, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s decision in City of Boerne v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm
Windsor, 570 U.S. ___, 133 S. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
