Search for: "Government Employees v. Windsor"
Results 81 - 100
of 121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2012, 1:24 pm
The one DOMA case distributed for the September 24 Conference is Windsor v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:44 am
Office of Personnel Management and Windsor v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the 2022 case that overturned Roe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:25 pm
Judge Mark Bennett entered a consent decree on February, 28, 2014, resolving the brought by the EEOC in EEOC v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:03 pm
Of course, there is very little chance that the current government in Ontario will permit a work stoppage at York University, or any other educational institution. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 8:16 am
Dukes and AT&T v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
Mgmt., The Office of Personnel Management needs to know the underlying data an insurer used to calculate its $1,610 reimbursement to an out-of-network provider for a government employee's $56,000 outpatient weight-loss surgery, a federal appeals court has ruled. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:59 pm
I’m interested in one sentence buried deep in the report: After the decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in Saskatchewan Federation of Labour v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:52 pm
The same constitutional principle of equal protection applied to same-sex couples in Latta applies with equal force to public employees in government workplaces. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
Koontz v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm
They can design a single-user bathroom, permit the transgender student to use a faculty bathroom, or any other option that will make sure that student is never in the presence of students with a different biological sex while using a bathroom or changing.Custodians, EMTs, and student aides may set foot in the “wrong” bathroom if need be.The same rules apply to all bathrooms housed by public agencies (including courts, the legislative and executive branch, and the state’s public… [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 8:51 am
VERRILLI: With Congress, it’s true there have been times in the [United States v.] [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
Zarda and Bostock were consolidated in the Supreme Court, and the Harris Funeral Home case, involving former employee Aimee Stephens, remains a stand-alone case.The Supreme Court is a majestic building, constructed in the 1930s, when government buildings stood for something. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:43 am
Windsor (excerpted in the 1978 Digest of U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
The first is the extent to which the governing statutes displace negotiated contract terms and general contractual doctrines. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 10:07 am
Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 2:45 am
Supreme Court released its landmark decision BOSTOCK v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:40 am
Citing Bowers v. [read post]
