Search for: "Graham Smith" Results 41 - 60 of 763
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2012, 1:07 am by sally
Graham Smith, deputy information commissioner, told the Solicitors in Local Government annual weekend school last week that ‘silly and daft’ requests would be covered by existing guidance on vexatious requests.” Full story Law Society’s Gazette, 5th April 2012 Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 10:40 am by Bob Ambrogi
Opus 2, the London-based collaboration platform for law firms, has a new CEO today, as founder and majority shareholder Graham Smith-Bernal becomes executive chairman focused on long-term strategy and culture, and board member Martin Coen takes over as chief executive. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The abiding impression left by the government’s Initial Response to the Online Harms White Paper Consultation is that it is half-finished. [read post]
31 May 2021, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Two years on from the April 2019 Online Harms White Paper, the government has published its draft Online Safety Bill. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Never mind Brexit, what is coming up on the UK internet legal scene in the coming year? [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The decision of the European Court of Justice in Svensson v Retriever Sverige AB (Case C‑466/12, 13 February 2014) has established some important points about the legality of linking under EU copyright law: A clickable direct link to a copyright work made freely available on the internet with the authority of the copyright holder does not infringe. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 5:57 am by INFORRM
From what feels like time immemorial the UK government has paraded its proposed online harms legislation under the banner of ‘What is Illegal Offline is Illegal Online’. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 2:21 am by INFORRM
A preview of some of the UK internet legal developments that we can expect in 2017. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Seven years ago I started to take an annual look at what the coming year might hold for internet law in the UK. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
A preview of some of the UK internet legal developments that we can expect in 2018. [read post]
12 May 2019, 5:06 am by INFORRM
Before the publication of the Online Harms White Paper on 8 April 2019 I proposed a Ten Point Rule of Law test to which it might usefully be subjected. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Here are some EU and UK internet legal developments to look out for in 2015 (last year’s list here). [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
One of the more perplexing provisions of the draft Online Safety Bill is its multi-level definition of legal but harmful content (“lawful but awful” content, to give it its colloquial name). [read post]
3 May 2018, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
Right now the ECommerce Directive – or at any rate the parts that shield hosting intermediaries from liability for users’ content – is under siege. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 7:04 am by INFORRM
Back in July 2011 I commented on the Court of Appeal judgment in Newspaper Licensing Agency v Meltwater ([2011] EWCA Civ 890) and explained how the reach of digital copyright had accidentally been increased beyond that in the offline world. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Should social media platforms be subject to a statutory duty of care, akin to occupiers’ liability or health and safety, with the aim of protecting against online harms? [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
A bumper crop of pending litigation and legislative initiatives for the coming year (without even thinking about Brexit). [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Big Brother Watch has this week published the results of its research, conducted via freedom of information requests to police forces, into charges and cautions under two communications offences: Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 and the Malicious Communications Act 1988. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:30 am by INFORRM
Section 5 of the Defamation Act 2013 provides (or will do when the Act comes into force) a complete defence from a defamation claim for a website operator who can show that it did not post the statement on the website. [read post]