Search for: "Graham Smith"
Results 81 - 100
of 761
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2021, 5:23 pm
One of the more intriguing aspects of the draft Online Safety Bill is the government’s insistence that the safety duties under the draft Bill are not about individual items of content, but about having appropriate systems and processes in place; and that this is protective of freedom of expression. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:16 pm
Graham, ___ N.C. ___, 2021-NCSC-125 (Oct. 29, 2021). [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 8:19 am
Davidoff StevenDavidoff Berkeley Máiréad Enright marieadenright Birmingham (UK) Law & Religion Feminism Citizenship Rosa Freedman GoonerDr Birmingham (UK) Graham Gee GDSGee Birmingham (UK) Steven Vaughan lawvaughan Birmingham (UK) Sarah Lucy Cooper SarahLucyCoope1 Birmingham City (UK) Kent Greenfield Kentgreenfield1 Boston College Hiba Hafiz… [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Graham Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Graham Co. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit departed from the Supreme Court’s decisions in Graham v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
It was my great honor to have been asked to participate in the brilliant Conference "The Life and Work of Robert M. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
National/Federal Delta Variant Postpones K Street’s Full Return MSN – Kate Ackley (Roll Call) | Published: 9/14/2021 On the cusp of Memorial Day back in May, most lobbyists were gearing up for a more normal return to their in-person work life, as they began to reemerge for meetings on Capitol Hill and sessions with clients and colleagues. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 4:23 pm
As Graham Smith, author of Internet Law and Regulation and of Counsel at Bird and Bird notes in ‘Speech vs Speech’, freedom of expression under the ECHR cannot be simply understood as simply a limit on the coercive power of the state. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:46 am
Smith, 152 Ill. 2d 229, 263 (1992). [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 1:50 pm
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. (1) The trial court properly excluded proffered evidence that another person committed the crime. (2) An alleged error in a photographic lineup did not constitute plain error when the defendant did not also object to the witness’s in-court identification. (3) The prosecutor’s statement at closing about a defendant’s… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Trade Groups Wrestle with Supporting GOP Lawmakers Who Embrace Trump’s Election Lie MSN – Allan Smith (NBC News) | Published: 7/26/2021 The January 6 Capitol riot forced the sprawling network of Washington, D.C. trade associations, which represent everything from hedge fund managers to construction contractors, to reconsider their political contributions. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:59 am
As Graham Smith has enquired: “If you want to carve out the press [from the online safety measures], how do you do so without giving the government (or Ofcom) power to decide who does and does not qualify as the press? [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:40 pm
One of the more perplexing provisions of the draft Online Safety Bill is its multi-level definition of legal but harmful content (“lawful but awful” content, to give it its colloquial name). [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 2:50 am
Can something that I write in this blog restrict someone else’s freedom of expression? [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 4:09 pm
When he announced the Online Harms White Paper in April 2019 the then Culture Secretary, Jeremy Wright QC, was at pains to reassure the press that the proposed regulatory regime would not impinge on press freedom. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:45 pm
The Court in In re Graham, 21 B.R. 235, 238-39 (Bankr. [read post]
31 May 2021, 4:52 pm
Two years on from the April 2019 Online Harms White Paper, the government has published its draft Online Safety Bill. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:01 pm
Graham v. [read post]
