Search for: "Graham v. People" Results 81 - 100 of 773
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
  Likewise, although Graham announced that the subpoenas are necessary because "[t]he American people deserve answers to these questions" about "why all these counterintelligence investigations were opened to begin with" and "how these investigations got off the rails," a recent Office of Legal Counsel opinion insists that "transmitting information “to inform the public . . . is not a part of the legislative function. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Jamison Chung
Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:05 am by INFORRM
Harm is thus equated with people changing their opinion about a telecommunications project. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
  Quashing multiple defamation proceedings initiated against media the judge said public servants and constitutional functionaries must be able to face criticism since they owed a solemn duty to the people. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
The move comes amid growing U.S. scrutiny of the app, which allows users to create and share short videos of themselves with millions of people worldwide. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 7:55 am by Dan Bressler
Unfortunately, some will choose to exploit any weaknesses or vulnerabilities we may have and will see opportunity in other people’s misfortune. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Forbes had a piece “Zoom Alternatives: 5 Options For People Who Care About Security And Privacy”. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The Court evaluates the use of force under Graham v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:45 am by Jonathan Shaub
Lindsey Graham characterized the House as “blow[ing] through these privileges” and insisted he would not “destroy the privilege” by seeking testimony. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
At Subscript Law, Daniel Kohrman offers a graphic explainer for Babb v. [read post]