Search for: "Grand Central Public Market v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
So publicizing the indictment helps the prosecution.The unsealed indictment alleges that Latchford "engaged in a scheme to sell looted Cambodian antiquities on the international art market, including to dealers and buyers in the United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
So publicizing the indictment helps the prosecution.The unsealed indictment alleges that Latchford "engaged in a scheme to sell looted Cambodian antiquities on the international art market, including to dealers and buyers in the United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 7:00 am
Yet Europe and the United States are at loggerheads over how regulation fits in the Rethink. [read post]
3 May 2017, 11:03 am by Tamera H. Bennett
 You can see this application in the following cases – both out of the seventh circuit: Fortres Grand Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2006, 4:47 am
And that is what at least some of the Founders might have preferred.Hamdan represents the continuing struggle for dominance between three great schools so political thought in the United States: constitutional structuralism, political constitutionalism and ideological supremacism. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:00 am
It originates from the rights of privacy afforded under the United States Constitution, but surprisingly, there is no federal right per se. [3]  [4] Rather, forty states recognize either a statutory or common law right of publicity, and fourteen extend its reach beyond a person’s death. [5] As a result, California’s right of publicity laws are different from New York, etc., which means that a lawsuit’s outcome is highly dependent on… [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:03 pm by Jeff Gamso
At the time the United States Constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788, the sole and sovereign power to regulate the state business and affairs rested in the state legislature and has always been a compelling state concern and central to state sovereignty.  [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 6:57 pm
") But as in the United States, there is a sense of the great risk of pouring such huge amounts into failed or potentially failed enterprises, along with the fear that such infusions opf cash are necessary given the actual state of the markets to be protected. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
The implications for those who seek to legalize  markets and the private sphere, or those who seek to choke the public sphere, may be unavoidable though unpleasant.The Chinese response will likely mirror those of the US central authorities--augmenting the thrust of decoupling, inward self-development (dual circulation policy), and sanctions as the two systems pull apart (here). [read post]
5 May 2018, 7:43 am by Rachel Bercovitz
James Pohl’s April 25 ruling denying defendant Mustafa al-Hawsawi’s defense motion to dismiss in United States v. al-Hawsawi; the legal weight of reports that “major combat operations” have concluded in Iraq; and the contours of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis’s report on the future of detainee policy, among others. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:02 am
It originates from the rights of privacy afforded under the United States Constitution, but surprisingly, there is no federal right per se. [3]  [4] Rather, forty states recognize either a statutory or common law right of publicity, and fourteen extend its reach beyond a person’s death. [5] As a result, California’s right of publicity laws are different from New York, etc., which means that a lawsuit’s outcome is highly dependent on… [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
The two-day conferencegathered the intellectual acumen of many academic and professional leaders from Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Macau, mainland China, Netherlands, Singapore, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and  United States, to name but a few. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]