Search for: "Grand Jury Matter, in Re"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2008, 3:15 am
In In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated Oct. 22, 2001, the court recognized a difference between "need" in the context of trial testimony, where corroboration is important, and need in the context of grand jury testimony, where the issue is simply establishing probable cause. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:13 am
It’s also a crime to disclose the nature or substance of any grand jury testimony or any decision, result or other matter attending a grand jury proceeding. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:31 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit: In re Grand Jury Matter #3, 2017 WL 383361 (2017) (per curiam). [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:51 pm
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Doe. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
ShareAfter the oral argument in In re Grand Jury, the smart money would have predicted either that the court would affirm the U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:21 am
In In re Grand Jury, an unnamed law firm challenged a grand jury subpoena for documents withheld under a claim of attorney-client privilege. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 2:32 pm
The appellate court rejects the “inherent authority” of the courts to disclose grand jury matters and seeks to inhibit any circumventing or disregard of the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:43 pm
If you have a dispute about something that is occurring in grand jury in one of your cases, you may seek to have the County Court Part I Judge resolve the matter by requesting to see the judge with the prosecutor. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:29 am
Maintaining secrecy is also key to preventing district courts from creating additional exceptions to grand jury secrecy—since a district court first claimed inherent authority to disclose grand jury material in In re Petition of Kutler, the court explains, there have been a steady stream of requests for disclosures. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 6:00 pm
So the court’s ruling in In re Grand Jury Subpoena is effectively the first peek at a very secret case. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:51 am
Miller failed to appear before the grand jury. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 8:14 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in In re Grand Jury. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
The government's need for the secrecy of the grand jury proceedings is protected by temporarily restraining Twitter from divulging any information about the underlying grand jury subpoena until after this Court issues a final ruling in this matter. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:26 am
In the in re Grand Jury Subpoena case itself, the commercial activity exception might apply whether under federal common law or the FSIA, so the distinction may not matter. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 3:26 am
The defendants in In re Grand Jury Subpoenas had to find that out the hard way. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 1:12 pm
In McKeever, the court affirmed a district court’s order denying release of grand jury matters in a 1957 indictment, which McKeever sought during research for a book he was writing. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 5:21 pm
It is therefore urged that the court should concede to the District Attorney that judicial permission is not necessary to re-present the evidence to a new Grand Jury. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am
Under section 6(e) of the FRCP, certain people involved in a grand jury proceeding “must not disclose a matter occurring before the grand jury,” including the grand jurors themselves, the government attorney presenting the case to the grand jury, the court reporter and other technical people involved in the proceeding itself. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 10:28 am
As an initial matter, Rogers considers the committee’s request that the district court summarizes the argument, “exercise its continuing supervisory jurisdiction concerning the grand jury to authorize and order the release of grand jury records. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:20 am
"We're not aware that a federal grand jury is investigating this," an Avon spokeswoman told the Journal. [read post]
