Search for: "Grant J. Book" Results 1 - 20 of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2016, 3:30 am by Ray Dowd
All practice, no theory.Copyright Litigation Handbook (Thomson Reuters Westlaw 2015-2016) by Raymond J. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 6:04 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The district court granted summary judgment based on its conclusion that Google’s copying is fair use under 17 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by John Willinsky
The latest is the Humanities Open Book grant program, a million-dollar joint initiative of the Mellon Foundation and the National Endowment of the Humanities, the two principal funders, private and public, of the humanities in America. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:00 pm by Smita Ghosh
In the Arguing History podcast, Lynn Dumenil and Christopher Capozzola consider the relationship between America’s involvement in World War I and the granting of women the right to vote. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 8:15 am by Cary Wiggins
Alameda Books, Inc., 535 U.S. 425, 449 (2002) (Kennedy, J., concurring)). [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 12:30 am by Smita Ghosh
Adam Gopnik reviews the book in the New Yorker, taking an appropriate digression to summarize Grant’s drinking problem. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
(from the book, Pasquale Annicchino, Coherence (and Consistency) or Organized Hypocrisy? [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Oct. 18, 2019 Murray, J., Strassburger, J., and Pelligrini, J.) [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
There's more of the publication's reviews available here, including The Forgotten Presidents: Their Untold Constitutional Legacy by Michael J. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 10:52 am
ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18 Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International LawJean Galbraith, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law Recent Books on International LawKaren J. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  In some circumstances, where one party is more knowledgeable in publishing matters, it may be appropriate to grant that person the exclusive right to negotiate with agents and publishers. [read post]