Search for: "Grant v. Grant" Results 261 - 280 of 104,279
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2024, 4:01 am by Brooke MacKenzie
For the past several years, I have assigned the 2013 decision in LSUC v Melnick as required reading to the upper-year students in my Legal Ethics class at Osgoode. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Did the district court err in determining that Parnell could not establish a presumption of jury prejudice based on adverse pretrial publicity under Skilling v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm by Amy Howe
., where it was all but certain to be heard by Matthew Kacsmaryk, a conservative federal jurist there who, before becoming a judge, had written articles criticizing the court’s landmark decision in Roe v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 11:27 am by Eric Goldman
” Instead, the court looks to see if Twitter properly alleged special damages, such as consequential damages (Hadley v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
I know the Ninth Circuit was trying to be nice; indeed, generous. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Corp., 118 AD3d 454 [1st Dept 2014]; see also Matter of Orange County Publs. v Kiryas Joel Union Free School Dist., 282 AD2d 604, 606 [2d Dept 2001]). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Corp., 118 AD3d 454 [1st Dept 2014]; see also Matter of Orange County Publs. v Kiryas Joel Union Free School Dist., 282 AD2d 604, 606 [2d Dept 2001]). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of Geico’s motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the cause of action for punitive damages against it because “no separate cause of action for punitive damages lies for pleading purposes” (Crown Fire Supply Co., Inc. v Cronin, 306 AD2d 430, 431; see Podesta v Assumable Homes Dev. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
NO APPEAL LIES FROM A DEFAULT DETERMINATIONAfter the New York County Civil Court granted Google’s motion to dismiss the case, on default, the plaintiff, T. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:36 am by Dennis Crouch
Supreme Court is weighing whether to grant certiorari in Vanda Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]