Search for: "Grant v. Grant" Results 81 - 100 of 104,345
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  In VX v Gemeinde Ummendorf (C-456/22), the CJEU found that there is no de minimis threshold for damage, below which individuals cannot claim for compensation. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:27 am by Rose Hughes
 Further ReadingBoeing's comma drama: Commas and taking the description into account when construing a claim (T 1127/16) (April 2021)Another case of catastrophic comma loss (T 1473/19): Interpreting the claims in view of the description (Jan 2023)EPO tries to have its cake and eat it on claim interpretation (T 0169/20) (March 2023)Construing the claims to include technical effects mentioned in the description (T 1924/20) (April 2023)The risk of pre-grant description amendments (T… [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
And, apparently, there were “issues of fact” in that regard.They sure labored over that.# # #DECISIONS. v 340 W. 12 Realty LLC [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 12:38 pm by Chris Sutton
” Tax exempt status, the Court pointed out, is the “withholding of a tax burden” but is not “an affirmative grant of funds . . . [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:31 am by Unknown
(Race Discrimination; Section 1981; Peyote) Conway v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:34 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
Emma v MEC for Health Gauteng Province (2022/12482) [2024] ZAGPJHC 276 (15 March 2024) (saflii.org) This blog was authored by Brigitte Geyer, candidate attorney, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
In fact, he claimed not to have known what triggered his fall.While the plaintiff claimed to have been confused as to whether he was being asked about the conditions at the top or bottom of the stairs, the AD1 thought that explanation was "insufficient" to justify relief in his favor, particularly since he never expressed any confusion when he was testifying.Given that the change was “material and critical,” the AD1 thought the motion court should have granted the… [read post]