Search for: "Grant v. Grant" Results 101 - 120 of 104,366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  In VX v Gemeinde Ummendorf (C-456/22), the CJEU found that there is no de minimis threshold for damage, below which individuals cannot claim for compensation. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:27 am by Rose Hughes
 Further ReadingBoeing's comma drama: Commas and taking the description into account when construing a claim (T 1127/16) (April 2021)Another case of catastrophic comma loss (T 1473/19): Interpreting the claims in view of the description (Jan 2023)EPO tries to have its cake and eat it on claim interpretation (T 0169/20) (March 2023)Construing the claims to include technical effects mentioned in the description (T 1924/20) (April 2023)The risk of pre-grant description amendments (T… [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
And, apparently, there were “issues of fact” in that regard.They sure labored over that.# # #DECISIONS. v 340 W. 12 Realty LLC [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 12:38 pm by Chris Sutton
” Tax exempt status, the Court pointed out, is the “withholding of a tax burden” but is not “an affirmative grant of funds . . . [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:31 am by Unknown
(Race Discrimination; Section 1981; Peyote) Conway v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:34 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
Emma v MEC for Health Gauteng Province (2022/12482) [2024] ZAGPJHC 276 (15 March 2024) (saflii.org) This blog was authored by Brigitte Geyer, candidate attorney, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa. [read post]