Search for: "Grant v. Mueller" Results 1 - 20 of 381
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2020, 11:15 am by Amy Howe
The post Court shelves oral argument in dispute over Mueller materials, grants two new cases appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Many of the constitutional issues that Mueller grappled with were unsettled when his report was written.Nixon v. [read post]
In addition to granting a delay, the Supreme Court Friday granted certiorari for two cases focusing on alleged police misconduct, Caniglia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:09 pm by Justin Florence, Larry Schwartztol
As our organization, United to Protect Democracy, pointed out in this memo, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 10:23 am by Amy Howe
The district court granted the committee’s request, and the U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 5:30 am by Steve Vladeck
Notwithstanding the modesty of these proposals, at least some conservative legal scholars have argued that they’d be unconstitutional, pointing to Justice Antonin Scalia’s celebrated dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Ben Sasse spoke for a number of the bill’s critics when he voiced concern that this provision would be unconstitutional as a matter of separation of powers: “Many of us think we are bound” by Justice Antonin Scalia’s lone dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 6:01 am by Quinta Jurecic
Trump’s affinity for Russia or its president, Vladimir V. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
One of the cases referenced in the Mueller Report is United States v Aguilar, 515 U.S. 593 (1995), in which the Court held that uttering false statements to an investigating agent who might or might not testify before a grand jury is not sufficient to constitute obstruction. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
One of the cases referenced in the Mueller Report is United States v Aguilar, 515 U.S. 593 (1995), in which the Court held that uttering false statements to an investigating agent who might or might not testify before a grand jury is not sufficient to constitute obstruction. [read post]