Search for: "Grant v. Royal" Results 1 - 20 of 976
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2007, 6:44 am
General Motors Corporation v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance (2007) EWHC 2206 (Comm) is a rather convoluted case on whether a consent order, in the circumstances of the case, amounted to an exclusive jurisdiction agreement in favour of the English courts, and whether an application for an anti-suit injunction could therefore be granted. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 6:53 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Tenth Circuit opinion: MURPHY v ROYAL OPINION Order Denying En Banc Petition [amended panel opinion] Here are the merits briefs: Joint Appendix Petitioner’s Briefs Petitioner’s Brief United States Brief in Support of Petitioner States Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioner Environmental Federation of Oklahoma Amicus Brief International Municipal Lawyers Association Amicus Brief Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Association Amicus Brief Oklahoma Sheriffs_ Association… [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 8:33 am by CivPro Blogger
Royal Dutch Petroleum, No. 10-1491, to be argued with Mohammad v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:24 am
An update from SCOTUS - the court granted certiorari in the Kiobel v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 10:31 am
R (Shields) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWHC 3102 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 398 “The Secretary of State for Justice had power to consider exercising the royal prerogative of mercy to grant a free pardon in respect of a person convicted and sentenced by a foreign court but transferred to the United Kingdom to [...] [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 8:15 am by Roger Alford
Royal Dutch Petroleum/Shell and Mohamad v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:34 am
Regina (Shields) v Secretary of State for Justice Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “The Secretary of State for Justice did have power and jurisdiction to consider granting a pardon under the Royal Prerogative in respect of a person convicted and sentenced in a foreign court but transferred to the United Kingdom to serve his sentence. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 1:33 am
It seems that the paper's reliance on Charly's chain of title was illusory because the companies' application for summary judgment was granted in December 2007. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:10 pm by InternationalLaw Blogger
The first is Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum in which the Second Circuit Court of Appeals held that corporations are not liable for torts in violation... [read post]