Search for: "Grant v. Strong" Results 61 - 80 of 5,380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2008, 4:44 pm
., to have review granted by the California Supreme Court -- there's a strong tendency to write an expansive missive on the subject. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 2:49 am
William Strong and Joseph Bradley were then nominated by Grant and confirmed by the Senate in 1870. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 12:30 am by INFORRM
In Fuchsmann v Germany, the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights held that an entrepreneur’s Article 8 rights were not violated by the publication of an article linking him to Russian organised crime. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court on Monday granted no new cases. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:31 am
  But it's not a felony to possess it, at least if you're 21 and it's under an ounce.There is, in fact, a strong argument that that's exactly what the text of the statute provides.So why does the California Supreme Court basically have to grant review? [read post]
13 May 2016, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
The case (Power Places Tours Inc and others v Free Spirit and another) is unusual as one of the injunctions granted was to protect US residents from being harassed online by an individual, notwithstanding that they did not appear to have any special connection to the jurisdiction or to have suffered any detriment within it. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
In Pryanishnikov v Russia ([2019] ECHR 614), a case concerning the authorities’ refusal to grant the applicant a film reproduction license, the European Court of Human Rights found a violation of the right to freedom of expression, as the only reason advanced by the domestic courts for the refusal of the relevant license had been based on mere suspicions rather than findings of fact. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 1:10 pm by Tom Goldstein
I happened to be in the courtroom today for the argument in Doe v. [read post]