Search for: "Grant v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 28,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2024, 8:29 am
By Helen Boone According to Walter Lehmann, out of the 35,000 museums in the United States, only 50 maintain in-house counsel.[1] For those institutions without a lawyer on staff, it can be difficult to determine when a problem requires legal attention. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 7:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:47 am
As Dennis Crouch has recently noted, the reach of SAS may soon be tested in United Therapeutics Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:27 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:26 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm
As the Supreme Court made clear in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 3:14 pm
Supreme Court case, United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 2:51 pm
Duration: Design patents in the United States last for 15 years from the date of grant.[14] During this period, the patent holder has exclusive rights to make, use, sell, or import the design. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 2:51 pm
From the website of the Administrative Conference of the United States: The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) is pleased to announce a public forum, Recent Administrative Law Developments in the Supreme Court: What’s Next for Agencies? [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 10:15 am
A new case questions a long-held understanding of termination’s impact outside the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
IOP E(b); United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
IOP E(b); United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am
In July 2024, the Center for Art Law met with the Korea Copyright Commission to discuss copyright protection for choreographers in the United States and the challenges related to enforcement. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 10:12 am
After granting the developer’s new trial motion based on Protect Tustin Ranch v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 3:56 pm
Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 6:52 am
” Feliciano asserts that the word “during” simply denotes a temporal connection, not a substantive one, citing United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 2:28 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 9:03 am
We reject that result because the United States Constitution cannot properly be so interpreted. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
On April 24, 2024, the Chamber of Commerce of the United States (“U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 1:45 pm
Sec'y of State's Off., 841 F.3d 791, 794 (9th Cir. 2016) (O'Scannlain, J., dissenting from the grant of rehearing en banc); United States v. [read post]
