Search for: "Grant v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 28,531
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
BackgroundIn 2008, Yannick Noah, a French former tennis player, registered the following figurative sign (the Mark) as a European Union trade mark (EUTM), in respect of a number of categories of goods, including leather goods, clothing, games and playthings (the Registration): In 2019, Noah Clothing LLC, a clothing company based in the United States, filed an application with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) seeking revocation of the Registration,… [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
In Guerra v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:45 pm
United States, 22-2248 (Fed. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:08 am
Co v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 10:14 am
Della v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:39 am
Same-Sex Marriages As of right now, Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Tomorrow, on February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm
As this Court stated in Grant 2009, in order to assess this factor, the court must “look to the interests engaged by the infringed right and examine the degree to which the violation impacted on those interests” (para. 77). [56] When additional rights and breaches of those rights are factored into the s. 24(2) analysis, there will necessarily be a more significant impact on the accused that is therefore relevant to the analysis of the second Grant factor. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 12:53 pm
Facts: This case (Miranda Polk v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:48 am
“Why the Supreme Court Should Grant Certiorari in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
In 1938, Congress established a nine-person Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise Committee with representatives from the United States House of Representatives, the United States Senate, and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
Court of Appeals decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am
United States) or whether an issue lacks "judicially discoverable and manageable standards" to apply as law (such as political gerrymandering claims, as in Rucho v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
Along with the Supreme Court’s affirmation of the high burden of proof employer must meet to justify refusing to grant religious accommodations to employees in Groff v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
Larue v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:00 am
In Discovery Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm
Miniard 23-444Issue: Whether, when counsel is physically present, state action is required before a court may find a complete denial of counsel under United States v. [read post]
