Search for: "Grant v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 28,531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ford, President of the United States of America, proclaim and make public the Treaty, Protocol of Signature, and the exchange of notes, to the end that they shall be observed and fulfilled with good faith on and after January 21, 1977, by the United States of America and by the citizens of the United States of America and all other persons subject to the jurisdiction thereof. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ford, President of the United States of America, proclaim and make public the Treaty, Protocol of Signature, and the exchange of notes, to the end that they shall be observed and fulfilled with good faith on and after January 21, 1977, by the United States of America and by the citizens of the United States of America and all other persons subject to the jurisdiction thereof. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 8:35 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
The United States (DOJ and PTO) argued that cert should be granted on this issue, agreeing with Commil that issues of validity are irrelevant to infringement. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 4(1) states generally that extradition shall not be granted if the offense for which extradition is requested is a political offense. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:25 am by immigrationprof
Supreme Court today granted certiorari in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 6:17 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
This week, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Hemphill v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:49 pm
United States District Court (In re United States), 791 F.3d 945 (9th Cir. 2015). [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall be granted only if the evidence be found sufficient, according to the laws of the place where the person sought shall be found, either to justify his committal for trial if the offense of which he is accused had been committed in that place or to prove that he is the identical person convicted by the courts of the requesting Party. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:25 am by sally
FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 696; [2010] WLR (D) 152 “Where a person who had been granted leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom for a year or more appealed against the refusal of his claim for asylum under s 83 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 he was entitled, by virtue of the principle of equivalence under Community law, to include the refusal of his claim for humanitarian protection in… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:56 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
In part: Big news in the field of computer search and seizure today: The Second Circuit has granted rehearing in the full case of United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 2:42 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On appeal from: [2011] CSIH 28 The appellant is an Iranian national, previously granted refugee status by the United Nations High Commission for Refugees in 1998 in Iraq as he feared persecution as a member of the Kurdistan Democratic Party of Iran. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
PROTOCOL TO THE TREATY BETWEEN ROMANIA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS OVERVIEW The Protocol to the Treaty between Romania and the United States of America on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters (the ‘‘Protocol’’) serves to implement, as between the United States and Romania, the provisions of the 2003 Agreement on Mutual Legal Assistance between the United… [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 6:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Cert Petition Questions presented: Whether the Trial Court and the Court of Appeals committed prejudicial error in barring/blocking a Native American tribe from pursuing in rem / quiet title remedies on lands promised and granted to them by the USA from that tribe, but stolen by another tribe based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to the non-justiciable political question doctrine.Whether or not, the Court committed prejudicial error by blocking a native American… [read post]